Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1937No. 8247PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought this action against appellees under section 4 of the Clayton Act of October 15, 1914, c. 323, 38 Stat. 731 (15 U.S.C.A. § 15), to recover threefold damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of a combination or conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 210 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note). The amended complaint (hereinafter called the complaint) is in two counts stating or purporting to state two causes of action. The first is for damages alleged to have been sustained by K. H.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Jeffrey Parchman v. SLM Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Barnes Coal Corp. v. Retail Coal Merchants Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.