Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1934No. Civ. 8978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff brought three actions against the defendants, respondents herein. The first was one to quiet title to certain real property; the second to cancel and declare void a certain promissory note, trust deed and contract of purchase, and the third to enjoin certain municipal court actions. The three actions were consolidated in the lower court and tried as one. In the action to quiet title, plaintiff claimed the property in fee. Defendant Chandler claimed that the property was encumbered by a trust deed given to secure the payment of a promissory note executed by plaintiff as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dolbeer v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cassetta v. BaimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Rancho San Carlos, Inc. v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hockett v. Pacific States Auxiliary Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Phillips v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API