Legal Opinion

In re State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 2003No. 2002-753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

In these cases consolidated for appeal, the petitioner, the State of New Hampshire, seeks a writ of certiorari challenging the jurisdiction of the sentence review division (division) to hear and decide constitutional claims. We grant the petition, vacate the orders of the division and remand.

The three defendants, Chad Evans, Steven Summa and Allan Cullen, were convicted of various felony offenses and sentenced to terms of incarceration in the State prison. When each defendant was sentenced, the sentencing judge did not inform him that under a recently enacted statute, see RSA 651:58, I (Supp.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Big League Entertainment, Inc. v. Brox Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. In re Ryan G.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. In re TurgeonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Guardarramos-CepedaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Petition of EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Evans v. GerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Evans v. Warden, NHSPDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API