Legal Opinion

In re Turgeon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 27, 1995No. 93-627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The petitioner, Ronald 'Turgeon, seeks a writ of certiorari challenging the sentence review division’s decision upholding a sentence imposed by the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.). He argues that the sentence is illegal under RSA 651:6 (1986) and that it violates double jeopardy. We deny the petition.

In 1989, the petitioner was convicted of felonious sexual assault, a class B felony, RSA 632-A:3 (1986), and indecent exposure, a misdemeanor, RSA 645:1 (1986). He was sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment, pursuant to RSA 651:6 (1986), of ten to thirty years for the felony. The trial court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Melton v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. State v. New Hampshire Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. Exeter & Hampton Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Guardarramos-CepedaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In re Ryan G.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. 74 Cox Street, LLC v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API