Legal Opinion

Appalachian Power Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, J.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

So far as necessary for the decision of the case, the questions raised by the assignments of error will be disposed of in their order as stated below.

1. Does it appear from the evidence that the award of the commissioners in the instant case was arrived at through a misconception of the principles of law which should have governed them in their action?

*26The question must be answered in the affirmative.

There are two principles which should govern commissioners in assessing the damages for the property and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  4. Central Georgia Power Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Bonafield's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chappell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  2. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. GormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Appalachian Power Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  4. State Highway & Transportation Commissioner v. Lanier Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Fonticello Mineral Springs Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API