Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1994No. 1994-1814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 437.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SIMON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon,

1994-Ohio-11.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation—Notarizing and witnessing signatures on a deed not signed in his presence. (No. 94-1814—Submitted October 11, 1994—Decided December 30, 1994.) On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 94-42. __________________ {¶ 1} On March 9, 1994, at the request…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. MecklenborgOhio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API