Legal Opinion

Palmer v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

The cause presents in the main only issues of fact wbicb the jury bas determined. The main item of damage claimed by the plaintiffs was the destruction of a store building. The store building bad never been rented out, but the sons of plaintiffs used the building for mercantile purposes with the understanding that the plaintiffs were to have their supplies at wholesale price in lieu of a stipulated rental. On cross-examination the plaintiff was asked whether or not the business bad been prosperous. Tbe plaintiff objected to this question and answer, and excepted to the action of the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Durham v. Trustees of Bullock ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Northgate Shopping Center, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API