Legal Opinion

Hebrew Home & Hospital for Chronic Sick, Inc. v. Davis

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite, in conjunction with its suit for plenary relief, to restrain and enjoin the defendants from engaging in acts interrupting, interfering with and harmful to its proper functioning.

The defendants countermove to dismiss the complaint as insufficient in law, claiming that the picketing here in question *174involves and grows out of a labor dispute and therefore there is a failure on the part of the plaintiff in its complaint to make the necessary allegations required by section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act.

Plaintiff is a domestic membership…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jewish Hospital v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Society of New York Hospital v. HansonNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Beth-El Hospital v. RobbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Brooklyn Hebrew Home & Hospital for the Aged v. OttleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mount Sinai Hospital, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Annenberg v. Southern California District Council of LaborersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Keefe v. Organization for a Better AustinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Walinsky v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Annenberg v. SOUTHERN CAL. DIST. COUNCILCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Southside Hospital v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API