Legal Opinion

Keefe v. Organization for a Better Austin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1969No. Gen. 53,057PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Defendants appeal from an interlocutory order "which found that their activities in Westchester, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago where plaintiff, a real estate broker, resided, “invaded plaintiff’s right of privacy.” The order temporarily restrained defendants from passing out literature and from picketing “anywhere in the City of Westchester,” but denied injunctive relief as to plaintiff’s place of business in the Austin neighborhood of Chicago. Defendants’ direct appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court was transferred to this court on the ground that it had no jurisdiction on direct appeal in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nora Garcia v. William GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Stansbury v. BeckstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Carl's Meat & Provision Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Carl's Meat & Provision Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Nora Garcia v. William GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API