Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 30, 1997No. Civ. 97-0106 B(POR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDERING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN EXPUNCTION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is an action for equitable relief to expunge Plaintiffs criminal arrest record. The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment. After due consideration of the papers filed by both parties, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment and orders the Defendant to show cause why an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Alan SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. WileyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999