Legal Opinion

Ripperger v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1954No. Docket 38, Calendar 45,942PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The superior court of Grand Rapids .granted a request of the water resources commission and decreed that the city of Grand Rapids construct adequate sewage disposal facilities and refrain from further pollution of the Grand river. The city commission complied by enacting ordinance 1340, thereby placing the entire sewage disposal service on a utility basis, and also prescribed rates for the use of same.

Plaintiffs do not question the commission’s action in the passage of the ordinance, or the authorization •or sale of the bonds. This appeal presents to this 'Court 2 questions:

1. Did the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Laverents v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Jones v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. City of Edwardsville v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. City of Harrison v. BraswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. MedeirosHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jersey City, Etc., Auth'y v. Housing, Etc., Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API