Bolt v. City of Lansing
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*82Saad, P.J.
In this original action under Const 1963, art 9, § 32, plaintiff, a taxpayer by virtue of his ownership of real estate located in the City of Lansing, challenges the city’s storm water service charges as being a disguised tax. The question presented is whether Lansing may charge landowners for the cost of separating the storm water and sewage systems, and treating the storm water runoff, without submitting the question to the taxpayers for a vote. The answer is “yes” if the charge is a user fee; “no” if it is a tax.
i
FACTS
The existing Lansing wastewater disposal system combines…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Merrelli v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ripperger v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Airlines Parking, Inc v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Niles Township v. Berrien County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Saginaw County v. John Sexton Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Jackson County v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Niles Twp. v. Berrien Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.