Legal Opinion

State v. David

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 14, 2005No. 49075-3-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1

2Per curiam

— This case was remanded to us following our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Hughes1 We withdraw the former unpublished section F of State v. David2 relating to the exceptional sentence and replace it with this published section C.

C. Exceptional Sentence

¶2 David also contends that the trial court erred in imposing an exceptional sentence under RCW 9-.94A.535.3 Recently, the Supreme Court in Blakely v. Washington4 held unconstitutional an exceptional sentence that is based on facts (other than prior convictions) not found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Blakely does not *234invalidat…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State Of Washington, V. Alejandro Pena SalvadorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. State Of Washington v. Michael Thanh DoneryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State v. TalbottWashington Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API