Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Michael Thanh Donery

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 2, 2020No. 79803-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 79803-1-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL THANH DONERY, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) ) VERELLEN, J. — A defendant has a constitutional right to an impartial jury. But the trial court’s denial of a defendant’s challenge of a juror for cause does not violate any rights of the defendant if the challenged juror does not sit on the panel, even if the defendant chose to exercise a peremptory challenge. Because neither of the jurors Michael Donery challenged for bias were seated, he fails to establish…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. FireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API