Legal Opinion
Lamborn & Co. v. Log Cabin Products Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
This is a suit for damages for breach of contract. The evidence has been taken, and each party has moved for a directed verdict in its own favor. The broad ground, in each motion, is that the evidence conclusively shows that the moving party has performed the contract on its part, and that the opposite party has failed in performance. It becomes necessary, therefore, to examine the contract and the evidence as to the performance by the respective parties.
The contract is one for the sale of 5,000 bags of Java white sugar, to be delivered f. o. b. cars New York, shipment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Propeller Niagara v. CordesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Thomas Gordon Malting Co. v. Bartels Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Mora Y Ledon v. . HavemeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- A. & R. Realty Co. v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- James B. Berry's Sons Co. of Illinois v. Monark Gasoline & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Slater v. BerlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Lamborn v. National Bank of Commerce of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.