Saybe v. Sage
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Gilpin District Court — Hon. A. H. DeFrance, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice . Gabbert
delivered the opinion of the court:
Appellee, plaintiff below, brought suit against appellant, as defendant, to quiet title to- the Borton lode mining claim, and to have a tax deed declared void. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.
The first point urged, is, that plaintiff failed to establish he was in possession of the property in controversy at the time he commenced his action. There is testimony from which it appears that defendant took possession of the lode claim in 1893, and possibly it might be said, remained in possession…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Morris & Thombs v. St. Louis National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Deputron v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gomer v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. MasonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Fastenau v. EngelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Colpitts v. FastenauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.