Legal Opinion

Kirshner v. Palmer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 3, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendants move for an order modifying a notice of examination pursuant to Rule 26, et seq., Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, of certain employees of the defendants.

The action is for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff while she was a passenger for hire on a train of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad, of which the defendants are trustees in reorganization.

The defendant has agreed to produce their engineer, conductor, trainman, agent in charge of Operating Rules and agent or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. JanasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Lester v. Isbrandtsen Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API