Legal Opinion
Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1971No. 24990_1PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff and defendants are engaged in the design, manufacture, and sale of fine jewelry.
Plaintiff charged defendants with infringing plaintiff’s copyright registration of a pin in the shape of a bee formed of gold encrusted with jewels. A consent decree was entered, reciting that the parties had agreed to a settlement of the action and entry of the decree. It provided that plaintiff’s copyright of the jeweled bee was “good and valid in law,” that defendants had manufactured a jeweled bee “alleged to be similar,” and that defendants were enjoined from infringing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Apple Computer, Inc., a California Corporation v. Franklin Computer Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.