Barnebey v. Zschach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A writ of habeas corpus will lie in certain extraordinary circumstances where there is an unlawful restraint of a person’s liberty and there is no adequate legal remedy present. State ex rel. Firman v. Money (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29. Habeas corpus relief is the exception rather than the general rule in child custody actions. Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 141, 145, 637 N.E.2d 890, 894. In order to withstand dismissal, a petitioner in a habeas corpus action must plead operative facts with particularity and cannot rely on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Hammond v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Holloway v. Clermont County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Holloway v. Clermont Cty. Dept. of Human Serv.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. C v. v. Adoption Link, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.