Legal Opinion
Pullman Power Products of Canada Ltd. v. Basic Engineers, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1998No. 1660PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
Stone & Webster Canada, Limited (“S & W”) appeals from the July 15, 1997 trial court order certifying this case for immediate appeal to this Court pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(c); said order stated, “It is expressly determined that an immediate appeal of this Order would facilitate resolution of the entire case.” Trial Court Order, 7/15/97. The July 15,1997 order amended the trial court’s June 26, 1997 order, which sustained the preliminary objections of S & W and dismissed the lawsuit filed against S & W by plaintiff-appellee Pullman Power Products of Canada Limited (“Pullman”).
S…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- ROBERT H. McKINNEY, JR. v. AlbrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Prelude, Inc. v. JorcykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Liberty State Bank v. Northeastern BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Bailey v. RAS Auto Body, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Roth Cash Register Co. v. Micro Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Gustine Uniontown, Inc. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.