Bailey v. RAS Auto Body, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
Appellant, Ward Bailey, individually and t/d/b/a Springs Body Shop Supplies, appeals two interlocutory orders, via an order granting certification under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c), entered in the Erie County Court of Common Pleas. For the following reasons, we quash this appeal.
As the genesis of this appeal is two interlocutory pre-trial orders, the trial court has not yet made factual findings or *1066legal conclusions with regard to many of Appellant’s substantive allegations. Therefore, our statement of the relevant facts is for background purposes only and does not foreclose formal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of Considine v. Wachovia BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re Estate of CellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- ROBERT H. McKINNEY, JR. v. AlbrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Stahl v. RedcaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pullman Power Products of Canada Ltd. v. Basic Engineers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller, S. v. Shutt, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Miller, S. v. Shutt, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- 535 Penn Invest. v. Delaware Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust v. Limberis, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- BouSamra, G. v. Excela HealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.