Legal Opinion

Arlene Dahl Dillon, Dominik E. Moszkowicz and Karen R. Moszkowicz, and Madeline D. Sitzes v. Rosalie Dahl Estate Trust, Rosalie Dahl, Beneficiary of the Rosalie Dahl Estate Trust, and Ted Dahl, Trustee of the Rosalie Dahl Estate Trust

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 27, 2003No. 14-01-01240-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed in Part and Remanded and Opinion filed March 27, 2003

Reversed in Part and Remanded and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-01-01240-CV

____________

ARLEEN DAHL DILLON, DOMINIK E. MOSZKOWICZ,

KAREN MOSZKOWICZ, and MADELINE D. SITZES, Appellants

V

ROSALIE DAHL ESTATE TRUST, ROSALIE DAHL, BENEFICIARY OF THE ROSALIE DAHL ESTATE TRUST, and TED DAHL, TRUSTEE OF THE ROSALIE DAHL ESTATE TRUST, Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 00-23660

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In the latest episode of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brown v. HavardTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Davis v. GrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Thalman v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API