Gulling v. Washoe County Bank
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Washoe County; B. F. Curler, Judge. Action by Rosan Gulling, Executrix, and Charles Gulling, Executor, against the Washoe County Bank. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Washoe County; B. F. Curler, Judge. Action by Rosan Gulling, Executrix, and Charles Gulling, Executor, against the Washoe County Bank. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. I. The judgment and decision of the court in this action is contrary to law, for the reason that all matters sought to be litigated in this action were fully litigated and determined by the court in the action of the Farmers’ and Mechanics’ Savings Bank v. Pollock and Others, as shown by the pages of the record herein…
1Opinion of the Court
By tbe Court,
Talbot, J.:
On March 1, 1893, James Pollock, bis wife, Delia, and Daniel Powell, who are admitted to have been tbe owners at that time, executed to B. U. Steinman and C. H. Cummings, as trustees, a trust deed for certain property near Reno to secure tbe payment of a promissory note of tbe *482same date, given'by the Pollocks and Powell to Farmers’ and Mechanics’ Savings Bank of Sacramento, for $8,000 and interest. This deed directed the trustees, in ease of default in payment, to sell the property at Sacramento after giving notice, to apply the proceeds in satisfaction of the note and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Clements v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- White v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Rose v. TreadwayNevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Maples v. GellerNevada Supreme Court · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gulling v. Washoe County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1907