Maples v. Geller
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fourth District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, Hon. C. C. Goodwin presiding. The facts of the ease are stated in the opinion of the Court. That portion of briefs in relation to statute of limitations is omitted, as that part of the case was never examined or passed on by the Court. The other points made by Appellants were: First — No default was ever ‘entered against defendants as required by Practice Act.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Fourth District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, Hon. C. C. Goodwin presiding. The facts of the ease are stated in the opinion of the Court. That portion of briefs in relation to statute of limitations is omitted, as that part of the case was never examined or passed on by the Court. The other points made by Appellants were: First — No default was ever ‘entered against defendants as required by Practice Act. Second — The judgment is not such a one as a Clerk may enter up. It is a decree directing certain things to be done. (See KelT/y v. Yam, Alstme, 17 Cal. 364.)…
1Concurrence
Opinion by
Beatty, J., BkosNAN, J.,
concurring.
The facts of this case are as follows: In 1860, Eichard Baffer & Co. were doing business as partners at Humbug, *235California. The plaintiff alleges W. TI. Stoule was the partner of Raffer. Raffer & Co. executed their note to Joshua Maples, at tlieir place of business in California, on the 18th day of January, 1860, payable on demand. In the Winter of 1860, Joshua Maples died intestate, and, on the settlement and distribution of his estate, this note of Raffer & Co. was turned over by the administrator to the present plaintiff, who was the widow of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ortega v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Luke v. CoffeeNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Gulling v. Washoe County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1905