Legal Opinion
Pal v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 3, 2015No. 45594-3-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Magdalene Pal appeals the dismissal of
Maxa, J.
her request for an administrative hearing to challenge a finding of the Adult Protective Services (APS) program of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) that she had neglected a vulnerable adult in her care. The administrative law judge (ALJ) dismissed Pal’s request because she faxed it to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) on the due date but after the 5:00 pm regulatory deadline for filing hearing requests, and because she failed to comply with a regulatory requirement that she mail the request on the same day she faxed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dale E. Alsager, D.o., Phd. v. Wa State Bd Of Osteopathic MedicineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Stericycle of Washington, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Lucid Group Usa, V State LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Stericycle Of Wa, Inc. v. Wa Utilities & Transportation Commission,respondentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Tacoma Police Department v. Hong Mei ZhenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021