Legal Opinion

Rice v. Cayetano

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 6, 1997No. CIV. 96-00390 DAEPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.

On February 26, 1997, Plaintiff Harold Rice filed for partial summary judgment on his remaining claim that the voting requirements for elections for the Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs violate the Constitution and the laws of the United States. On February 28,1997, Defendant Benjamin Cayetano, Governor of the State of Hawaii, filed for partial summary judgment on the same issue. The court heard argument on these motions on April 28,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rice v. CayetanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Rice v. CayetanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. CayetanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Carroll v. NakataniDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
  5. Maunakea v. Hu (In Re Maunakea)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API