Legal Opinion

Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Cayetano

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2000No. 23309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

This is an original proceeding brought by Petitioners Office of Hawaiian Affairs and its trustees (OHA) and Respondent Governor Benjamin Cayetano, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Hawai'i (Respondent), on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-51 and Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 182 to answer the following questions:

1. Did the United States Supreme Court’s recent opinion and judgment in Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495, 120 S.Ct. 1044, 145 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2000)] create a “vacancy” that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Rice v. CayetanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Mary Fishe Bell v. J. W. SouthwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Hadnott v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dejetley v. Kaho'ohalahalaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sierra Club v. Castle & Cooke Homes Hawai'i, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hussey v. SayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hussey v. Say.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Sierra Club v. Castle & Cooke Homes Hawai'i, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API