Legal Opinion
Loppert v. WindsorTech, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided June 25, 2004No. Civil Action 441-NPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHANDLER, Chancellor.
Plaintiff David Loppert moves for summary judgment. Loppert seeks to enforce a settlement agreement reached between him and defendant WindsorTech, Inc. For the reasons set forth below, I grant the motion.
I. STANDARD
This Court may grant a motion for summary judgment if there is no genuine dispute as to the material facts and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 1
II. MATERIAL FACTS WITHOUT GENUINE DISPUTE
Loppert and WindsorTech are parties to an action in this Court brought by Loppert under 8 Del. C. § 220(d), captioned Lop-pert v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Starter Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Converse, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Gilbert v. El Paso Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Catullo v. MetznerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Leeds v. First Allied Connecticut Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1986
- Anchor Motor Freight v. CiabattoniSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. CampbellSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Parker-Hannifin Corp. v. Schlegel Electronic Materials, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Maya Swimwear Corp. v. Maya Swimwear, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Givaudan v. ConagenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Dweck v. NasserCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.