Legal Opinion

Cabeen v. Breckenridge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. Ira 0. Wilkinson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an action of ejectment, brought in the Mercer Circuit Court, to recover a tract of land lying in that county. Upon the trial in the circuit court, appellant read in evidence, a patent from the United States Government, dated the 2d of June, 1818, for the premises in controversy, to Daniel Dougherty; a deed from him to Joseph Watson, dated the 11th of August, 1818, recorded in Mercer county, the 20th of May, 1863 ; a deed from Watson to James Smith, dated the 20th of January, 1820, recorded the 14th of January, 1863, in Mercer county ; also a deed from Smith to Joshua Cabeen, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rupert v. MarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Keys v. TestIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Noakes v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Worden v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. West Chicago Street Railroad v. Morrison, Adams & Allen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stebbins v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Partridge, Wells & Co. v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Stump v. Swanson Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API