New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. Roush

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the referee’s finding of fact that the Roush lease had not been conveyed to the appellant company was confirmed by the District Court and should not be disturbed for anything less than a demonstration of plain mistake (Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Bridge, 6 Cir., *41284 F.2d 660, 663; Bagley v. Rowley, 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 139, 140);

And it appearing that the record presents no evidence of any order of the bankruptcy court conveying to the appellant company any right, title or interest in the Roush lease,…