Legal Opinion

Gazo v. Gazo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 23, 1997No. 95-339Published

1Opinion of the Court

697 A.2d 342 (1997)

Sally GAZO

v.

John GAZO.

No. 95-339.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

May 23, 1997.

Marsha Smith Meekins of Roesler, Whittlesey, Meekins & Amidon, Burlington, for plaintiff-appellant.

John R. Durrance, Jr. of Gaston, Durrance & Fairbanks, Montpelier, for defendant-appellee.

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.

DOOLEY, Justice.

This action for child custody and support requires us to grapple again with the difficult issue of a proposed relocation in the midst of a divorce. We hold that the family court exceeded its authority in defining a relocation as a change of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kanaan v. KanaanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. DeBeaumont v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Hughes v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API