Commonwealth v. Cicere
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appellant, Angelo Cicere, was convicted of murder of the first degree, and sentence on the verdict was affirmed: Com. v. Cicere, 282 Pa. 492. On petition of defendant alleging after-discovered evidence, we issued an order to the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Westmoreland County to grant a rule for new trial nunc pro tunc, under the Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245. The rule was allowed, but, after hearing, was dismissed and new trial refused; this appeal followed.
The Act of 1903, from which these proceedings derive their validity, provides, in section 2, that, “Upon the termination…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CicereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Twenty-First Senatorial District NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. GreasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- White Township School Directors AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Walker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Plum Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.