Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Altenhofen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2014No. DA 13-0642PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Timothy Gibbs (Tim), Roderick Gibbs (Rod), and L.H. “Lee” Gibbs, individually, and L.H. “Lee” Gibbs and Reginald Gibbs, as trustees of the R’Delle Gibbs Family Trust (collectively the Gibbs), appeal from orders of the Seventh Judicial District Court, Dawson County, granting James Altenhofen, Delwin Nordtvedt, and CHMS’s motions for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

ISSUES

¶2 The Gibbs raise the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in finding that the Gibbs’ claims against Nordtvedt were barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion?

2. Did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. McDaniel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Dewey v. StringerMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Stewart v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Lone Moose Meadows, LLC v. Boyne USA, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Montana Environmental Information Center v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Heringer v. BarnegatMontana Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API