Legal Opinion

Smith v. Parman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1918No. 21,429PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition.

The action was one to recover damages for malicious prosecution. A plea in abatement by Parman, alleging that he acted in the matter as city attorney, resulted in a dismissal of the case as to him, which ruling was affirmed when the case was here before. (Smith v. Parman, 101 Kan. 115, 165 Pac. 663.) The case then proceeded against the other two defendants. The plaintiff filed an amended petition on the 5th day of May, 1916, and the only question involved is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Boeger v. LangenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Smith v. ParmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Ross v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Adams v. BicknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. House v. AneHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Vanover v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Elbrader v. BlevinsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Swanson v. FieldsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. Hill v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API