Harding v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. The facts are stated in the opinion. The prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment refer to all the instrumentalities of the State, to its judicial as well as to its executive and legislative authorities.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. The facts are stated in the opinion. The prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment refer to all the instrumentalities of the State, to its judicial as well as to its executive and legislative authorities. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy B. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226, 233; Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339, 346; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356. It is sufficient if it appears from the record that a right claimed under the Federal Constitution was specially set up dr claimed in the state court in such manner as to bring it to the attention…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This case was submitted on briefs, together with motion to dismiss or affirm. In support of the motion to dismiss the position taken is that no Federal question was properly raised in the state court, and therefore none is reviewable here.
The'case was commenced in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, to recover taxes for the years 1897, 1898, 1899 and 1900, on a block of land in the Elston Addition to the city of Chicago. ’• At the trial a jury was waived and, upon hearing, a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $2,123.05. An inspection of the record shows…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Central Land Co. v. LaidleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Marchant v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. DuvallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Capital Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.