Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS POR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. THE-facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This'case was argued and submitted with Waters-Pierce Oil Company, plaintiff in error, against the State of Texás, just de-. eided, No. 359, ante, p. 86. It is brought here to review the action of the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas affirming an order of the District. Court of Travis County appointing a receiver to take charge of the property,and business of the Waters-Pierce Oil Company. In view of the statement made in No. 359 it is unnecessary to repeat the facts leading up to the judgment in this case. On the same day that the judgment was rendered in the'former case-the State of Texas,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Leathe v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Harding v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- McCorquodale v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Giles v. Teasley, Board of RegistrarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by33 opinions
- Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Buck v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1939
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.