Legal Opinion

Metro Hauling, Inc. v. Daffern

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 4, 1986No. 14736-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.

Russell Daffern appeals from the triad court's denial of his counterclaim for relief under the usury statute in an action against him on a promissory note. We reverse.

On May 1, 1980, Daffern purchased a truck and trailer from Metro Hauling, Inc. Daffern executed as maker a promissory note for $27,000 at 12 percent interest, to be paid in monthly installments of $711.02. Metro retained title to the vehicles as security.

Daffern was chronically behind in payments, and Metro notified him that, as of February 15, 1981, it would begin charging additional interest as a late charge on his delinquent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Investors Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Scarr v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cuevas v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Roll Ex Rel. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. v. Rothenberg (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5983, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9618 Catherine Pierce Brown, a Single Woman v. Investors Mortgage Company Seattle Management Company Stephen H. Anderson Jane Doe Anderson Puget Sound Investment Group Cls Mortgage Inc. Thomas Harsh Inc., D/B/A Thomas Harsh Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API