Legal Opinion
Cuevas v. Montoya
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 23, 1987No. 7603-2-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.
Daniel and Shirley Cuevas sued Richard Montoya, claiming he charged, them excessive attorney fees, usurious interest rates and violated the Consumer Protection Act. Mr. Montoya answered, claiming that the Cuevases owed him attorney fees, and sought collection on a promissory note. The two actions were consolidated. The Superior Court reformed a statutory warranty deed to a mortgage and awarded Mr. Montoya judgments for attorney fees, the balance due under the promissory note and attorney fees to collect on the promissory note.
The Cuevases raise several issues; however, because the law…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. Investors Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Bryce v. Lawrence (In re Bryce)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- MacKey v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Mackey v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5983, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9618 Catherine Pierce Brown, a Single Woman v. Investors Mortgage Company Seattle Management Company Stephen H. Anderson Jane Doe Anderson Puget Sound Investment Group Cls Mortgage Inc. Thomas Harsh Inc., D/B/A Thomas Harsh Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.