Legal Opinion
Royal Thai Government v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 31, 2008No. Consol. 02-00026PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
This matter is before the Court following a court-ordered remand. See Royal Thai Gov’t v. United States, 31 CIT-, 502 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2007). In Royal Thai, the Court ordered Commerce to reconcile its inconsistent treatment of the Thai 10% “Normal” tariff rate. For the reasons stated below, this Court sustains Commerce’s remand determination.
I. BACKGROUND
The procedural history of this case is set forth at length in Royal Thai, familiarity with which is presumed. Id. Briefly, the relevant facts are as follows: after Commerce determined that the Thai duty exemption…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019