Legal Opinion
United States v. Henoud
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1996No. 94-5936PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge SPENCER joined.
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, John Maurice Henoud, was convicted of conspiracy and fraud in connection with an overseas call-selling scheme and ordered to pay restitution to the local and long-distance telephone companies he defrauded. He has challenged the district court’s order of restitution contending that it improperly requires him to pay certain companies not named in the indictment and an amount in excess of that alleged in the indictment. He has also argued…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. George Robert BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Josephine L. Broughton-Jones, A/K/A Josie BroughtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Darlene G. BrucheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Hector B. GermosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Harriet JinwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Taiwo Adeshola AkandeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States of America v. Edmond Xavier Ramirez, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.