Legal Opinion

Eduardo Cruz v. Robert Alexander and Edward Hammock, Chairman of the New York State Department of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 22, 1982No. 79, Docket 80-2329PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal, arising in the context of a habeas corpus attack upon a state conviction, concerns the adequacy of a prosecutor’s denial of a criminal defendant’s claim that his conviction resulted from electronic surveillance in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2515 (1976). On a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a New York conviction, the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) ruled that a state prosecutor’s duty to affirm or deny a colorable claim of wiretapping is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3504 (1976) and concluded that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Mark Lawrence AlterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Sherrie Tuggle Apple, United States of America v. Stacy Nevin Apple, A/K/A Dr. Stachel PommeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. FeltonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Vannier v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Cook County Grand JuryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Eduardo Cruz v. Robert AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API