Legal Opinion

State v. Anyan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2004No. 02-639PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Appellants Tanya Marie Anyan, Jay Cleveland, and Troy Klein were each convicted of drug-related felonies in the District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District, Sanders County, after pleading guilty to the charges pursuant to a plea agreement. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal: Whether law enforcement officers’ no-knock entry into Appellants’ house to execute a search warrant violated Appellants’ constitutional rights to privacy and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Factual and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. OchadleusMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. RuggirelloMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cassady v. Yellowstone County Montana Sheriff DepartmentMontana Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API