Legal Opinion
United States v. Articles of Device
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1973No. 72-1210PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for forfeiture of two machines seized in a doctor’s office under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. It is alleged in the complaint that the machines were misbranded in that the labels did not contain adequate directions for diagnosis and treatment of human diseases.
There are two machines against which the proceedings were brought and which were ordered condemned and destroyed by the trial court. One was described as a “KuF Diathérapuncteur” (KuF machine), and the other as a “Detecteur Niboyet GMG Schmidt D’Acupuncture” (the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bank of Utah, a Utah Corporation, and Bank of Ben Lomond, a Utah Corporation v. Commercial Security Bank, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Ellis Research Laboratories, Inc., and Robert W. Ellis, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- The Church of Scientology of California v. Elliot RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Moore v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished DevicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
- United States v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. 25 Cases, More or Less, of an Article of DeviceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Scott Stine CheatwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.