Legal Opinion
Yant v. Gundy
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 27, 2004No. 03-1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Yant, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Yant was convicted of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, armed robbery, five counts of felony firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm following a jury trial in the Oakland County Circuit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Donald Harris v. Clarice StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yant 237696 v. Michigan Parole BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Yant v. Gundy, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004