Legal Opinion

Yant 237696 v. Michigan Parole Board

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 3, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00978Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ JAMES N. YANT, Petitioner, Case No. 1:23-cv-978 v. Honorable Phillip J. Green MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (ECF No. 1, PageID.16.) Section 636(c) provides that “[u]pon the consent of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API