Legal Opinion
Donald Harris v. Clarice Stovall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 18, 2000No. 98-2308PublishedCited by 387 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
This appeal of the denial of a habeas corpus application requires us to apply the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-182, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996) (“AEDPA”). Donald Harris, a Michigan state prisoner serving a mandatory life term for first-degree felony-murder, appeals from an order of the district court denying his application for habeas relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The victim was John Anthony, who was killed at gunpoint while working in his store in Detroit. Harris did not commit the crime…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by387 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Donald Williams, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Angel Sellan v. Robert KuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
382 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.