Legal Opinion

Nissel v. Pearce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1988No. USDC Civil 87-886-PA; SC S34984PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*104PETERSON, C. J.

This case is before us on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon pursuant to ORS 28.200.1 The two questions certified are:(1) Does the sentencing judge have final authority to order credit for time served on each charge on consecutive sentences?(2) When a criminal defendant is given consecutive sentences, is the defendant entitled to credit for time served on each charge under ORS 137.320(4)?

We answer both questions in the negative.

THE FACTS

The plaintiff was convicted of Robbery in the Second Degree and attempted Burglary in the Second…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. State v. Cruz-MataArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Munden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Simms v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. EilolaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. TauiliiliHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MirandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API