Legal Opinion

State v. Tauiliili

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2001No. 23008PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

RAMIL, J.

The defendant-appellant Ropati Tauiliili appeals from the post-judgment order of the first circuit court, the Honorable Victoria S. Marks presiding, partially denying his motion seeking presentence credit for time served. On appeal, Tauiliili claims that the circuit court incorrectly interpreted HRS § 706-671, by failing to credit his 853 days of presentence imprisonment toward each of his three sentences.

We hold that the first circuit court (1) did not abuse its discretion when it partially denied Tauiliili’s motion seeking presentence credit for time served…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. CullenHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. EilolaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. KahapeaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PaveyMontana Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API