Legal Opinion

State v. Miranda

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1989No. 10589PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Judge.

The previous opinion of the court is withdrawn and the following is substituted.

Defendant appeals from an amended judgment and sentence granting him 63 days of presentence confinement credit. Two issues are presented on appeal: 1) the appropriate amount of presentence confinement credit to which a defendant, incarcerated on more than one case, is entitled and 2) whether it was error for the trial court to stack defendant’s parole periods after service of his consecutive sentences. We hold that defendant is entitled to an additional 24 days of credit. The trial court erred…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. DiazNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nissel v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. JohnsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. EilolaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. TauiliiliHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API