Legal Opinion
Arave v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 7, 2008No. 07-110PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent Maxwell Hoffman was convicted óf first-degree murder and sentenced to death. See State v. Hoffman, 123 Idaho 638, 851 P. 2d 934 (1993). Hoffman sought federal habeas relief on the grounds that, inter alia, his counsel had been ineffective during both pretrial plea bargaining and the sentencing phase of his trial. The District Court, finding that Hoffman had received ineffective assistance of counsel during sentencing but not during plea bargaining, granted Hoffman’s federal habeas petition in part and ordered the State of Idaho to resentence him. Civ. Action No. 94-0200-S-BLW (Mar.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Maxwell Hoffman v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, Department of Correction, State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by20 opinions
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Oneida Indian Nation v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.